data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2011f/2011f61d5e561cf33a5caa84cb9a4d2b6a51a119" alt=""
As always, the Stockbroker was hands-on, meticulous and precise in his wines' service - something I am always thankful for. Serving wine at improper temperature is a crying shame - good wines deserve proper respect.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bceb/5bcebed468db1f9bf289d7ef5554bef392022ca6" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7210/e72109d59174b4d2da8db3b092a7d63df27c18fd" alt=""
This particular wine was not anywhere near as sweet or cloying. At the outset, the Stockbroker told me he and JayLab noted some slight oxidation in it. After a couple of initial sniffs, there was, indeed a tinge of varnish/nailpolish remover to its floral, peach nose (indicative of ethyl acetate due to contamination of acetobacter spp., and, possibly, other bacteria, during the winemaking process) - quite noticeable, but not quite aggressive enough to be unpleasant. On the contrary, I thought it added a bit of interesting character to the wine and drank my glass down.
Initially, the nail polish was slight on the nose, not readily apparent mid-mouth, and came out more towards the back and finish. It faded a bit after some time in the glass though. Otherwise, it the wine was just slightly off-dry, with notes of peach, a hint of apricot and a whisper of pine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68c61/68c619ddf87d18670c94dec2441eaa1aa1502f28" alt=""
In the mouth, however, it was fresher and had a distinctly more minerally (slate?) character. There was obvious oak treatment and notably more heft/breadth as well. Pleasantly ripe, slightly sweetish stone fruit base, some white peach, healthy extraction. Nice. With its comparatively drier, more minerally character, it matched marginally better with my Crottin de Chauvignol than did the previously discussed wine.
~ oOo ~
First Flight
With my nice, earthy, wine-friendly dish of Goose Leg Confit atop Mushrooms with Baby Potatoes (sauce on the side please):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22871/22871c9538ac303538ec32407b9779dcec1efa1b" alt=""
Wine#2 - comparatively mute nose, profiles of dark red fruit, slight raisin,The 2003 was of medium weight, very ripely/sweetly fruited (dark raspberry dominant with red cherry, blackberry and cassis), a bit hot (i.e., alcoholic), a slight topnote of tin, mildly peppery and minerally, with mild anise and slight camphor notes. Very vintage expressive.
nicely hefty mid-palate, quite tannic, a bit of a drying finish. On the low side
of full-bodied.I ranked it 3rd best.It turned out to be the Stockbroker's 2001
Domaine Sainte-Anne "Les Mourilons" Saint-Gervais Côtes du Rhône Villages.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de45a/de45aab9d1b80f01e964a16615d62957a1fee2bc" alt=""
From Rasteau (in Southern Rhône, northeast of Châteauneuf-du-Pape) that uses a lot of grenache and is famous for its chocolatey, fortifide vin doux naturel. Peppery, minerally, ripe, fruity - mostly cherries, red currant and raspberry, then blackberry, kirsch, chocolate, a hefty dose of anise (much more pronounced than in the Mourillons). Youthfully alcoholic, tannins unresolved. Fruit seemed deeper-veined than the previous wine, body fuller and noticeably heftier as well. Feels modern to me, but that could be the vintage.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61733/61733757b3f85af2a57bde603f61e0b382d125ee" alt=""
At the outset, Felicia noted pronounced "tar" on the nose. I heard someone else (I don't recall who) saying that its aroma is reminiscent of Graves. I agree, definitely prominent in the nose are black gravel and asphalt. Garrigue as well.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b564/0b5649576d690442ba7bc5272fbfad16890e643f" alt=""
~ oOo ~
Second Flight
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89184/8918455700242d580d0b5704f6f536203819efd7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8992a/8992a4473dc7f2ec2e8c5a1435a3603dd21dd4d7" alt=""
Slight iodine on the otherwise nice, earthy bouquet of dried Provençal herbs (thyme, sage and rosemary detected). Richly extracted, deeply veined red fruit, kirsch, moderate anise, tobacco, nuance of cough drop, a bit medicinal, quite minerally, wood could use more integration.
Good structure and more than decent balance. Well-crafted but found the Fonsalette far too hard an act to follow.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f47e6/f47e6c65e4ac0da5bca65187153abad80dd1ef1f" alt=""
Macerated cherries, cranberry, blackberry, a bit of dark raspberry and even blueberry, underlying mild pruniness, topnotes of sweetish wet tea leaf. Quite woody even 10 years after vintage (will that ever integrate sufficiently?). Surprisingly light-footed on the palate compared to the two previous wines.
The finish starts off well enough but the fruit puts on the brakes halfway through resulting in a drying, tannic finish. Comes off a bit simple and rustic compared to the last two wines.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a9f8/3a9f8fe1f70a3482e2c125bd6f107f77756a6c07" alt=""
I sniffed and there was readily apparent creamy oak on the nose (new oak used I believe, but not excessive) over peppery, sweetish, almost dried cherry, craisin, raspberry, cassis, dark spice, mild licorice and a touch of violets. These were mirrored on the palate with the craisins on the surface and the cassis as a base. Good length.
Over-all, yes, probably the most fruit-driven, low acid, modern, international-styled wine of the bunch. This is not necessarily a bad thing. As a matter of fact, it seems to be the style that delivers at blind tastings and garners high scores from some of the most influential preofessional reviewers.
Personally, I find it quite enjoyable enough - not intellectually - but hedonistically - and the occasional hedonistic indulgence never hurt anyone.
~ oOo ~
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b884/8b88414bb4f04392e2b6ea32358f712724c470f9" alt=""
A couple of us of us (JayLab, Madame Vigneron and I to my recollection) guessed it was Bordeaux because of the shape of the bottle. To me, it looked and tasted at least 30 years old - clear, medium-dark brick red turning lighter and taking on a red-orange blush towards the rim. I think it was Johnny R. that commented that it had the appearance of a red Burgundy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6728/c67281c62a742ea088f70de9d46cdd363fae73bf" alt=""
JayLab identified it as a left-bank, while Madame Vigneron went so far as guessing that it was a Graves from the mid-1980s, specifically 1985 or 1986. I opined that it was a wine older than the 1980s, probably late 1970s. It turned out to be a...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec6ca/ec6ca0650bf052a1f8a4d3bed9badc29e058b6cf" alt=""
1982 Château Calon-Ségur
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d61d0/d61d0c3b00e0544201e0cbe0ccfda001825eab0a" alt=""
Possibly there are fresher, younger tasting bottles than this, but, somehow, I doubt it. I've had a few bottles of 1989 and 1990 Calon-Ségur over the last 6 or 7 years (since it is one of the favorite wines of my old friend Tonji) and I can't imagine them ageing more gracefully than this 1982. Drink up now or very soon if you have any, or, at the very least, crack one open and try it out.
~ oOo ~
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a0ba/1a0babd049cce7e597a56ee2ad1020e5b6ff4d01" alt=""
1990 Château Filhot Crème de Tête - Though I think I've had quite a bit of experience with the wines of Sauternes and Barsac, I've had only one previous taste of Filhot's wine (i.e., their 2003 at an all Sauternes/Barsac dinner), and never their top Crème de Tête. As you can see, it's old, dark amber-reddish gold color makes it look much older than a 1990 Sauternes normally does, but its vibrancy and freshness in the mouth, indeed, vehemently bely its appearance.
Candied apricot, tangy wild honey, sweet orange marmalade, vanilla and white flowers. Rich, extravagant flavors, but not heavy or cloying at all on the palate. Its balancing acidity and lift simply carry the wine so gracefully, its complexity dances on the palate. Absurdly good.
Johnny R., in a moment of inspiration, asked a waiter to bring over a bit of honey for the roquefort. I thought it excessive as the wine was plenty sweet enough - that is, until he urged me to just give it a try, saying that the bit of honey gives the wine's finish a bit of slightly burnt caramel and beurre noisette nuttiness. I tried it, and, by golly, he was dead on right. It simply pushed everything over the epicurean edge.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2bf2/b2bf20ccfa1531059ee396c3c4873bcfcf7af398" alt=""
Many thanks yet again, buddy. What a blast!
4 comments:
Chapeau, you really live good in Manila.
All the best,
Martin
www.berlinkitchen.com
Wow honey with the roquefort and sauternes - must have been a super combination....
Hi, Martin. Good to hear from you! Yes, I cannot complain. I usually just buy Bordeaux, Burgundy and Alsace wines. I am very lucky to have friends who buy in a much wider range who invite me to meals like this.
Best,
Noel
Hi, Miguel. I trust you are well-rested from your Bora vacation?
Yes, it was a study in excess. Johnny Revilla thought it up in a moment of inspiration; and we're lucky he did.
Best,
N
Post a Comment